Balancing State Regulation and Sports Autonomy: Legal Implications of Indonesia’s Ministerial Regulation No. 14 of 2024

Authors

  • Kasianus Joseph Junior Fenanlampir Master of Sports Science Study Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia.
  • Irmantara Subagio Master of Sports Science Study Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0265-7842
  • Arinto Nugroho Master of Sports Science Study Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-0007
  • Fatkur Rohman Kafrawi Master of Sports Science Study Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-0198
  • Noortje Anita Kumaat Master of Sports Science Study Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6045-7553
  • Achmad Widodo Master of Sports Science Study Program, Faculty of Sports and Health Sciences, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-9837

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53905/inspiree.v7i02.176

Keywords:

sports governance, organizational autonomy, socio-legal research, sports law, indonesia, ministerial regulation, regulatory hierarchy

Abstract

The  purpose  of  the study. This study aims to examine the legal position and governance implications of the Minister of Youth and Sports Regulation Number 14 of 2024 within the Indonesian sports regulatory framework, with particular emphasis on the balance between regulatory standardization and organizational autonomy in achievement sports. The research seeks to assess the consistency of the regulation with higher-ranking national legislation and international sports governance principles, especially those embodied in lex sportiva and the Olympic Charter.

Materials and methods. The study employs a qualitative normative–empirical approach. Normative analysis is conducted on primary legal materials, including Law Number 11 of 2022 on Sports, Government Regulation Number 46 of 2024, and the Ministerial Regulation Number 14 of 2024, supported by secondary legal sources and international sports governance instruments. Empirical data are collected through interviews and focus group discussions involving purposively selected stakeholders, including provincial sports organization administrators, sports law scholars, and sports governance practitioners. Data are analyzed using normative legal interpretation and thematic analysis, with triangulation applied to enhance analytical credibility.

Results. The findings indicate that the ministerial regulation introduces administrative mechanisms that extend into internal organizational domains, such as leadership selection and organizational congresses, which are normatively protected under national sports law. Normative analysis reveals inconsistencies within the regulatory hierarchy, particularly regarding delegated authority and organizational autonomy. Empirical findings demonstrate that stakeholders perceive these regulatory mechanisms as reducing flexibility, generating interpretative ambiguity, and affecting governance stability. The integration of normative and empirical results shows a convergence between legal inconsistencies and practical uncertainty in sports governance.

Conclusions. The study concludes that the governance of achievement sports in Indonesia is characterized by structural tension between regulatory standardization and organizational autonomy. While organizational autonomy is formally recognized within the national legal framework, it is subject to practical limitations arising from subordinate regulatory intervention. Regulatory incoherence not only undermines legal certainty but also affects institutional confidence and long-term governance sustainability. The findings underscore the need for regulatory approaches that respect hierarchical legal norms and international sports governance principles while preserving the operational autonomy essential for effective and sustainable sports governance.

References

Abel, R. L. (2018). Law in books and law in action: The classic distinction revisited. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031015

Aluchna, M., & Kuszewski, T. (2021). Responses to corporate governance code: evidence from a longitudinal study. Review of Managerial Science, 16(6), 1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00496-3

Banakar, R. (2014). Normativity in Legal Sociology: Methodological Reflections on Law and Regulation in Late Modernity. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09650-6

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806

Casanovas, P., Hashmi, M., Koker, L. de, & Lam, H.-P. (2024). A Three Steps Methodological Approach to Legal Governance Validation. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2407.20691

Chappelet, J.-L. (2020). Beyond governance: the need to improve the regulation of international sport. In Routledge eBooks (p. 4). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429453984-2

Chappelet, J.-L., Clausen, J., & Bayle, E. (2019). Governance of international sports federations. In Routledge eBooks (p. 197). Informa. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440250-13

Chappelet, J.-L., & Mrkonjic, M. (2013). Basic indicators for better governance in international sport (BIBGIS) : an assessment tool for international sport governing bodies. IRIS. https://iris.unil.ch/handle/iris/138880

Cotterrell, R. (2017). Sociological Jurisprudence: Juristic Thought and Social Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315167527

Dennie, M., & Hall, R. (2025). Dispute Resolution in Sports (p. 193). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-9748-9_9

Evans, J., & Silbey, S. S. (2021). Co-Opting Regulation: Professional Control Through Discretionary Mobilization of Legal Prescriptions and Expert Knowledge. Organization Science, 33(5), 2041. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1525

Foster, K. (2019). Global Sports Law Revisited. Entertainment and Sports Law Journal, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.16997/eslj.228

García, B., & Meier, H. E. (2020). Sport and public policy. In Routledge handbook of the sociology of sport (p. 389). Routledge.

García, B., & Meier, H. E. (2022). The “autonomy” of developing countries in the Olympic Movement: Assessing the fate of sports governance transplants in the Global South. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 4, 972717. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2022.972717

Gardiner, S., Parrish, R., & Siekmann, R. (Eds.) (2009). EU, Sport, Law and Policy: Regulation, Re-Regulation and Representation. (International Sports Law). Asser Press.

Gattinara, P. C., & Pirro, A. L. P. (2024). Movement Parties of the Far Right. In Oxford University Press eBooks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198892083.001.0001

Geeraert, A. (2018). The limits and opportunities of self-regulation: achieving international sport federations’ compliance with good governance standards. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(4), 520. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2018.1549577

Geeraert, A., Alm, J., & Groll, M. (2021). Good governance in international sport organizations: An analysis of the 35 Olympic sport governing bodies. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 13(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2021.1986165

González, C. P. (2022). The effective application of international human rights law standards to the sporting domain: Should UN monitoring bodies take central stage? The International Sports Law Journal, 22(2), 152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-021-00209-8

Grodin, E. (2015). An Internationally Intelligible Principle: Comparing the Nondelegation Doctrine in the United States and European Union. Perspectives on Federalism, 7(2), 56. https://doi.org/10.1515/pof-2015-0010

Hadi, S., Pratama, R. A., & Susanto, E. (2021). Normative review of sports law regulation in Indonesia: Challenges and prospects. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 2(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v2i1.23501

Hashed, A. A., Almaqtari, F. A., Elmashtawy, A., & Raweh, N. A. M. (2025). The Role of Governance Audit Mechanisms on Environmental Sustainability and Emissions in Saudi Arabia Under ESG Regulations. Sustainability, 17(9), 4020. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094020

Hessert, B., & Kihl, L. A. (2021). The CAS arbitration process and organizational legitimacy in sport. Journal of Sport Management, 35(5), 449. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2020-0199

James, M., & Osborn, G. (2025). Defining the olympic legal framework and the IOC’s lawmaking capability: lex Olympica, Olympic law and their relationships with lex sportiva and sports law. The International Sports Law Journal, 25(3), 130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-025-00300-4

Kihl, L. A. (2022). Development of a national sport integrity system. Sport Management Review, 26(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2048548

Krasner, S. D., & Weinstein, J. M. (2014). Improving Governance from the Outside In. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-120611-231838

Latty, F. (2005). Lex Sportiva - Research Into Transnational Law. Hal (Le Centre Pour La Communication Scientifique Directe). https://hal.parisnanterre.fr//tel-02455133

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian hukum [Legal research] (Rev. ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

McLeod, J., Shilbury, D., & Zeimers, G. (2020). An Institutional Framework for Governance Convergence in Sport: The Case of India. Journal of Sport Management, 35(2), 144. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2020-0035

Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mitten, M. J., & Opie, H. (2012). “Sports Law”: Implications for the Development of International, Comparative, and National Law and Global Dispute Resolution. In ASSER international sports law series (p. 173). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-829-3_9

Muttaqin, Z., & Hardianto, D. (2023). Kedudukan hukum peraturan menteri dalam hirarki peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia [Legal position of ministerial regulations in Indonesia’s legislative hierarchy]. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, 53(2), 310. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol53.no2.3521

Nugroho, A., & Sulistyowati, R. (2022). Sport law reform in Indonesia: Evaluating Law No. 11 of 2022 on sports. Asia-Pacific Journal of Sport Law, 8(1), 33.

Parrish, R. (2020). Regulating sport in the European Union. In Routledge handbook of football business and management (p. 112). Routledge.

Pijetlović, K. (2017). EU sports law: a uniform algorithm for regulatory rules. The International Sports Law Journal, 17, 86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-017-0114-7

Pound, R. W. (2020). Why the IOC cares about government interference in the national Olympic committees: History and rationale. The International Sports Law Journal, 20, 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-020-00172-w

Prasetyo, A. (2022). Judicial review atas peraturan menteri di bidang olahraga: Analisis yuridis [Judicial review of ministerial regulations in the sports sector: A juridical analysis]. Jurnal Hukum Administrasi Negara, 9(2), 88.

Putri, D. A., & Raharjo, A. (2023). Regulatory inflation and governance in Indonesian sports administration: A critical legal analysis. Indonesian Law Review, 13(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v13n1.869

Ratu, K. (2025). The Complexities of Illegal Athlete Transfers: A Challenge to the Integrity of Regional–National Championships and the Implementation of Law Number 11 of 2022. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 263. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v7i1.443

Sam, M. P., Stenling, C., & Tak, M. (2022). Integrity governance: A new reform agenda for sport? International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 58(5), 829. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902221125600

Sekhon, H., Roy, S. K., Chadwick, S., & Devlin, J. F. (2016). Corporate image and a sport’s governing body. Service Industries Journal, 36, 556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2016.1255729

Sotiriadou, P., Brouwers, J., Bosscher, V. D., & Cuskelly, G. (2016). The Role of Interorganizational Relationships on Elite Athlete Development Processes. Journal of Sport Management, 31(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsm.2016-0101

Vermeersch, A. (2019). All’s fair in sport and competition? The specificity of sport after Meca-Medina. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(3), 487. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1596166

Windholz, E., & Hodge, G. (2020). International Sports Regulation: An Evolving Private-Public Partnership. Figshare, 45(2), 298. https://doi.org/10.26180/5e151a9c3490e

Wood, M. J. A., Wood, C., Styring, P., Jones, C. R., Smith, J., Day, M., Chakraborty, R., & Mensah, G. I. (2022). Perceptions of Accountability and Trust in the Regulatory Governance of Wood Burning Stove Sustainability: Survey Evidence from the Post-Brexit UK. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4233888

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Fenanlampir, K. J. J., Subagio, I., Nugroho, A., Kafrawi, F. R., Kumaat, N. A., & Widodo, A. (2026). Balancing State Regulation and Sports Autonomy: Legal Implications of Indonesia’s Ministerial Regulation No. 14 of 2024. INSPIREE: Indonesian Sport Innovation Review, 7(02), 144-152. https://doi.org/10.53905/inspiree.v7i02.176

Similar Articles

121-126 of 126

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.