The Effect of Kinesiotaping and Nerve Mobilization on Reduction of Doms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53905/inspiree.v4i03.123Keywords:
kinesiotaping, nerve mobilization, domsAbstract
The purpose of the study. This research aims to determine the effectiveness of giving ice massage after training in reducing the occurrence of DOMS.
Method. The research design used was the Post Test Only With Control Group Design research method, the sample size was 20 students. The sample was divided into 2 groups, group I was the treatment group (kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization) and group 2 was the control group (without kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization). Subjects performed maximal contractions and exceeded the training load. Subjects performed 75 contractions and divided into 3 training sets. Each set of 25 contractions with a load of 18 kg. After training, the treatment group was given kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization, kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization were given after 30 minutes of training in the treatment group, then the control group was not given kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization. DOMS measurements were carried out using the talaq scale, where measurements were carried out after kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization were given and without kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization.
Result. For the non-kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization variables, the probability obtained was p 0.010 < 0.05. The difference between the treatment group and the control group using the Mann-Whitney test obtained a probability of 0.026 < 0.05.
Conclusion. By looking at the results of the data obtained, it can be concluded that providing kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization as quickly as possible can reduce the risk of DOMS, whereas without providing kinesiotaping and nerve mobilization cannot reduce the risk of DOMS. To avoid wider damage from the effects of overloaded training, giving ice massage early will help reduce the risk of DOMS.
References
Anonymous. 2010www.pjnhk.go.id, diakses padatanggal 10 April 2022 Armstrong RB. 1984. Mechanism of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness: A brief review. Med Sci Sports Exerc 16: 529-38.
Bertolini R.F Gladson, Silva ST, Trindade LD, Ciena PA, Carvalho RA. 2009. Neural mobilization and static stretching in an experimental sciatica model-an experimental study. Rev Bras Fisioter, Sao Carlos, v. 13, n.6, p. 493-8: ISSN 1413-3555.
Clarkson PM, Sayers SP. 1999. Etiology of exercise-induced muscle damage. CanJ Appl Physiol 24(3):234-248
Connolly, D. A., Sayers, S. P. & McHugh, M. P. 2003. Treatment and prevention of delayed onset muscle soreness (abstract). Journal of Strength Conditioning Research, 17(l):197-208. Retrieved from PubMed.gov on July 24, 2006.
Ellis RF, Hing WA. 2008. Neural mobilization: a systematic review of randomizedcontrolled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. The Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 16 (1), 8-22
Guyton, A.C., J. E. Hall, 2008. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 11th Edition. Jakarta: EGC Medical Books.
Herbert D Rob, Gabriel Michael. 2002. Effects of stretching before and after
exercising on muscle soreness and risk of injury: systematic review. BMJ volume 325 31; 325:468
Johansson PH, Lindstrom L, Sundelin G. 1999. The effects of preexercise stretching on muscular soreness, tenderness and force loss following heavy eccentric exercise. Scan J Med Sci Sports. 9: 219-2
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2000. Workshop on the role of health workers in sports, Bogor
Kysner Caroline & Colby Lyn Allen. 2007. Therapeutic Exercise Foundation and Techniques. Philadephia : FA. Davis.
Mallac C. 2006. What the slump test can reveal. Sports Injury Bulletin: 62, 6 Maclntyre DL, Reid WD, McKenzie DC. 1995. Delayed muscle soreness. The inflammatory response to muscle injury and its clinical implications. Sports Med 20(l):24-40
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Suriani Sari, Zusyah Porja Daryanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.